Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
和小偷家族还是有点类似的，都是一群没有血缘关系的人像家人一样生活在一起，但整体水平还是要比小偷家族差一点
7
电影好慢热，感情在线，依旧是是枝裕和，少了些韩国本身的味道。我觉得在成熟度上又回归了下，而不像小偷家族那样是被所有人喜欢。我还蛮喜欢的。女主演的真好。
啊这样的温情感觉太不真实了 表演也没什么出彩的地方 堕胎的话题有点应景
作为个人第一部是枝其实没有感觉很平庸，只是将一个灰色地带的温情童话原原本本展现在观众面前，适当而自然的煽情，就如涓涓细流一般 没有犀利的抨击也没有深刻的反思，提醒着我是枝补完计划是时候该提上日程了。宋影帝驾驭这样的角色简直轻轻松松正常发挥啊
是枝裕和属于创作水平线始终保持在较高位的导演，即使有时候犯些同质化、主题雷同的毛病，如果忘记掉可供比较、参照的作品，那些被垢病的作品仍然有其令人惊艳的本质。
有些细节 我还是佩服是枝裕和的（令我能多少从理性和感性上思考亲情 以及人与人关系的作品 真的不多
可能期望过高，最终感觉中规中矩。音乐、美术、故事，都是弄弄的是枝裕和的风味，家庭的话题永远是他最强烈的个人印记，但是日式的风格配上韩式的表演，又似乎没能很好融合到一起，太过理想化的结尾，反而消解了「东亚子女与父母」这层话题的严肃性和残酷性，《小偷家族》太好了，显得这部电影太一般了。
快看瞌睡了。依然是散装家庭式故事，但是却没有《小偷家族》那般震撼，也没有日系的那种深沉情感，整部影片的情绪浮于表面，比白开水还无趣，明明有很多引爆的点，是枝裕和却什么都没有做，换个人拍，加点动作戏，节奏紧张一点也许更好，IU不错！
在《小偷家族》里哭断气的我，再看这部全程冷漠脸。
意料之外的是枝裕和，那个在冷酷世界里描绘于事无补的糖衣的人好像老了，变得心软了。事实上，在当下此刻，这个比十八年前更加充满震荡与不安的世界，当我们再一次谈起母职与孩子，光有自觉存在的善良是不够用的。
无法忽略在剧作上的绵柔与无力，摩天轮上伸出的手和不小心打开的车窗成了最后的体面——属于是枝裕和的温存。甚至远不如上一部《真相》。某种同义性，不如去看《小偷家族》或者《晨曦降至》。
每个都有难言之隐的边缘人拼凑成临时家庭，
不太理解为什么宋康昊通过这部没啥发挥空间的片子拿了影帝
依然是熟悉的味道，即使是换了国家拍，还是属于是裕和的家庭伦理。
是枝裕和的电影拍来拍去都是一个味儿，这次只不过是换成了一波韩国人来演鸡汤，所以有点泡菜味儿罢了。鸡毛蒜皮套上个和风滤镜就出来糊弄人，都60岁的人了比他妈思春期的初中生还矫情。
有良知的人贩子和先遗弃后贩卖亲儿子的杀人犯母亲合伙卖娃之旅，一路坎坎坷坷一路温情脉脉。理性和感性，我都拒绝接受这样的逻辑和情感设定。
如此的大团圆结局，稍微有点社会经验，都知道这个结局非常不现实，且最终通向的很难是幸福的未来。
总体缺了一点是枝裕和日本本土的那种暗色调，多了一点韩风的蠢萌二蛮，故事线走的比较平顺，稍有一点跳跃，整体可看性还是不错的！
期望越大失望越大 感觉浪费一众优秀的演员 这个剧本真的是 无聊透顶
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
