A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
欲望本身无罪，一辈子就这么短，哪个人也不应该承受艾滋，戴套吧，悠着点吧。特洛耶希文长得也太美好了以至于我认为主角应该是积极的，等待总是难熬，况且是三个月的等待，到底有没有那该死的艾滋，到底是过好现在还是计划好将来，没关系，有人陪着，能好好面对还是充满希望。
这部也期待了很久，但看完心情复杂……首先没有想到会让我觉得很无聊！诚然我有很多喜欢的地方：摄影机无疑像是把戏剧舞台搬上银幕，白屏的开头和黑幕的结尾也别有用心，电影里的符号、造型、演员、场景和氤氲且黑暗的氛围也是我喜欢的。但就是啊，有很多方面没有做得很到位，例如这个偏装置艺术的后现代城堡在整部电影中的作用，还有演员使用古英语但仍然十分现代的口音，有一种同古典戏剧内核剥离的违和感。（3.5/5）(@Angelika)
The Equalizer vs. Dr. Dre, for there are liars and swearers enough to beat the honest men and hang up them
比想象中的好太多！剧情让我心碎无数次……Troye久违的主演影视作品，质量不错！Trouble好好听！看了剧也能get到Wait了！（因为歌好听plus看照片把片尾一秒不差看完了🤣
MV视感，看着很舒服，音乐也很舒服，印度小哥略显无聊。
OH MY Troye.谁不怀念放荡不羁爱自由 敢爱敢恨的少年时代呢？！
虽然片名上做了改动，但剧本其实是极为正统的莎翁剧作，所以试图从本片中解读出更多释义是困难的。影像风格可能是与之前几部麦克白电影最大的区别：荒野和室内景大量采用对称式构图；走廊上的门洞光影恰如一排剑阵；奇幻与现实无缝衔接；黑白摄影的另一个优点是弱化了肤色的差异，所以黑麦也显得不那么违和了。
与其说是电影倒不如说是一场氛围灯光布景都极佳的戏剧，只是剧本有点太简单…
棚内搭景的话 Coen 和 Delbonnel 联手从视觉上只能做到表现主义黑白 接下来人物登台近景特写 场次转换相近叠化 透过风沙烟雾 身影大小映照达到性格甚至命运铺垫 动作和液滴的平行剪辑 仿佛一个房间 一个场景 一组人物 一份独白 空洞失魂的质感 之前至少七八个版本都看过的我毫无触动可言 虽然 Burwell 这次突出弹拨和重击的音效拟声配乐 目标也是营造超现实的内心氛围吧 直到 Birnam 森林的到来是窗户刮进一阵树叶 气笑了 谢谢你 p.s. 兵刃的重量以及声音塑造也轻了不少 作为一个 Soundstage 来看很廉价 论残忍凶戾有波 论外景冷暖是库 论舞台创意要数 Patrick Stewart 大科恩这回年度失望
看得很享受很投入，可始终因为是莎剧的优秀底子，我看法鲨那实景版也是同样感受。但舞台戏剧电影，基里科的场景再黑白简约化，通过背台词和念台词，就能实现主题升华吗？德国表现主义就需要当下去重复致敬吗？实在不可能也没必要。更因为出自依赖剧本的科恩之手，再减一分。还是希望多些拉尔夫费恩斯版《科里奥兰纳斯》这类、把场景彻底至于当代新闻实景的莎改作品。
就这个颜值和配色也很赏心悦目了哈哈，
《蜘蛛巢城》比这强太多了
就是我看不懂，但是我很震撼的那种电影，光影美学非常上乘
我已经忘了多久没看中文字幕了，没办法，承认不看字幕听不懂这夹杂古英语的台词，尤其还是戏剧那种大段大段的独白。well有点神棍，那种宿命预言的，还是蛮感触的，其实还是Macbeth有点怂，我感觉，一边贪恋权力一方面还要装作君子，bluh，不过没办法，毕竟是tragedy。另外就是这个黑白片了，not a fan，so， 这个就有点那种刻意retro吧，不过我还是喜欢彩色，不过某些画面，确实是刻意的，能感觉到，应该会摄影的人或是懂的人能欣赏到吧。另外就是，Macbeth刚开始没咋觉得，后面开始莎人时，我就串戏了，DW还是那个DW。口音方面，听着很舒服，毕竟是美音，不用装奇怪的英音lol。演员嘛黑白电影真的分不出来，除非看头发，不然我真的分不出来。but whatever
莎翁台词耳熟能详的前提下，如何做出高作者性强风格化演绎作品的命题挑战让古典戏剧成为最适宜词牌。黑白的视觉策略几乎是删繁就简的极致，褪去所有星光与血色的喧哗干扰，光线操纵与戏台追光高度重合，复杂装置的几何线条和明暗分割组成装饰意味突出的美学影展。无数镜头构图符号象征趋于饱和，单帧如同摄影静画，戏剧与影像的鬼魅共生没过更应侧重的叙事和视听的蹊径，灵魂仍然是减去色彩由视觉消音所打光的舞台表演。无尽空洞的走廊和阶梯仿佛视错觉悖论扭曲的梦魇迷宫，追随贪婪投射的幻象悬崖打转，走向王冠的天梯却向着堕落地狱引路。无数直视镜头的特写强调表演的自白性质。魂灵萦绕不散，被心魔纠缠者前赴后继谋杀权欲腐蚀的心灵，女巫狂舞，黑鸦群起。漆黑，苍白，迷雾和暗夜是痴人说梦的二重奏。如果这是一次A24的纸刊专题策划，将会如何？
The lines are incomprehensible.
棚内搭景的话 Coen 和 Delbonnel 联手从视觉上只能做到表现主义黑白 接下来人物登台近景特写 场次转换相近叠化 透过风沙烟雾 身影大小映照达到性格甚至命运铺垫 动作和液滴的平行剪辑 仿佛一个房间 一个场景 一组人物 一份独白 空洞失魂的质感 之前至少七八个版本都看过的我毫无触动可言 虽然 Burwell 这次突出弹拨和重击的音效拟声配乐 目标也是营造超现实的内心氛围吧 直到 Birnam 森林的到来是窗户刮进一阵树叶 气笑了 谢谢你 p.s. 兵刃的重量以及声音塑造也轻了不少 作为一个 Soundstage 来看很廉价 论残忍凶戾有波 论外景冷暖是库 论舞台创意要数 Patrick Stewart 大科恩这回年度失望
很简单的糖水小片，没什么太深刻的东西但是很适合当前的我，只能说原来我现在经历的东西别人可能很早就经历过了，所以才能更早坚强起来、更早懂得如何面对生活。我想我也要努力变得更勇敢。ps戳爷和女主的脸真的真的太好看了！！！
女巫是最大亮点，想到麦姐Frozen的MV，其他的视觉风格实验其实英国剧团常在舞台上玩，并不惊艳，也可能是期望过高了。7/10
8分，表演出色，制作精美，摄影尤其出彩，科恩对情绪和气氛的把控深得我心
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
