A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?
气氛2|故事2|表演3 不是恶搞系列吗，搞这么假正经
《搞点新东西，不过我也不想丢掉那些旧梗》tbh，这类电影的次元跳跃是真的完全不受束缚，是观影最大的乐趣了
平心而论在这个糟烂的恐怖片时代本片的剧本算是非常扎实的了 角色设定和剧情都比较合理 气氛和故事也都有合理的起伏跌宕 把老恐怖惊悚片拍好现在变成了所有人的难题 本就应该属于小成本的类型 完全不能满足现代观众的审美和需求
到底要逻辑还是不要逻辑？一个质疑女友不跟对方上楼做爱的男孩，突然愿意独自在树丛里找人？一个前几分钟还在轮椅上哎哎叫的人，突然能持拐杖走路？刚刚教人不能独自下楼的人，独自在那边看电视？然后被捅又被枪伤的人，突然又若无其事？如果不要逻辑，就不要一边探讨逻辑一边毫无逻辑，这不是反讽，而是自己打脸毫无定位。杀了一个经典角色换来这些毫无逻辑的鬼角色，真的是毫无意义。新角色设定浅薄又不深刻，最后的25年前在同一栋房子发生的那段报道更像是嘲讽，25年过去了，好莱坞没有新的惊悚IP、还是只能炒冷饭
比4好看，女主最后真是又狠又帅（换谁不得这样啊哈哈哈）
不得不说人物有点蠢，但这种蠢在元电影的框架中又显得有点可爱，整片更像是有惊悚元素的轻喜剧。
没有看过前几部，可是这部前半还不错，后面太乱来了，质感一般，最后的结局还行
虽然都是那么无逼聊，看个念想
看到爆头那段又没忍住进来直接打二星了。先爆头再送人会死啊，菜鸡警察菜了五季了，死得其所!死得漂亮!
韦斯·克雷文的离世是恐怖电影世界的一大遗憾！
还不错, 跟<恐惧街>差不多水准. 比去年那个什么弱智的<月光光>强了不知多少
挺好的续集，没有扑街就是胜利，四星好评！！！
就这？这么普通的人为啥可以做到不打头就会复活？面具一脱战斗力直接从人类巅峰降低到人见人杀？简直无语了。
票房口碑双丰收的《惊声尖叫5》使得派拉蒙决定继续打造《惊声尖叫6》！马特·贝蒂内利-奥尔平，泰勒·吉勒特还会继续执导，期待！
针对饭圈文化设计杀戮游戏，也算是一种与时俱进吧。
well 我觉得电影票房差点就是编剧导演跳出来告诉观众这不是一部传统意义上的续集 谁也别想终结这个ghostface 可说白了还是一部中规中矩的slasher啊…
但是，凶手一般有俩人，其中一个肯定是男的。
没有看过前几部，可是这部前半还不错，后面太乱来了，质感一般，最后的结局还行
我竟然把这个和惊声尖笑搞混了😅。拍电影有风险。每个人都有自己的价值观没问题，问题在于如果需要用生命为廉价的价值观买单是否应该，又应该由谁来判断价值观的价值？扯远了，血浆片倒是不太恐怖。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
