The main character is Dr. Max Holst, a successful neurosurgeon. One day an intense little man named Steinmetz shows up, who has the real ability to create objects out of thin air, using only his mind. As no one believes him at first, he is held at a ward for mental patients, but manifests the key to his door and escapes. As he has a special interest in Dr. Holst, Steinmetz subsequently invites Holst to his large mansion, which is full of expensive paintings and sculptures, and proves to him that he can in fact materialise objects. Steinmetz’s abilities are evolving by leaps and bounds, and is progressing from being able to create objects only to being able to create living things. His ultimate ambition is to be able to create a human being. He tells Dr. Holst that if he will only perform a certain brain operation on him, Steinmetz will become able to attain his goal. He’s got all the necessary equipment set up in his basement. Dr. Holst, however, is too spooked by the whole thing to agree to this mad scheme, and refuses. Steinmetz then sets about manipulating Holst’s life, to pressure him into performing the operation. By then Steinmetz has become able to create a temporary human being, and in the hope that he can perhaps make his own creation perform the operation, he manifests a doppelganger of Dr. Holst. This double proceeds to take over Dr. Holst’s life, creating chaos for him professionally and personally. And then Dr. Holst starts fighting back. The ending has the dual virtue of being both unexpected and satisfying.
说实话觉得有点可笑 看的过程明显感觉到东西方洗的就不是一套脑啊 西方这套感觉洗的更彻底呢
这部电影的台词就是一切，酣畅淋漓的俩小时；“60s outside the bar, 50s inside the bar”
这个世界需要反抗和不同的声音，需要我们动脑去实现真正的民主和自由。哪怕反抗在“公平公正”面前一文不值，但是也依旧需要批判这个依旧病态的社会。
是否存在一个民权运动电影的现象？《芝加哥七君子审判》是目前看到最成熟的，无论是叙事线把握整合的能力还是煽情的能力（沉默与暴力的对接是最显见的精彩剪辑），奇怪的是，要为这类电影做一个精彩的收尾莫非真是一件难事？太泄气了
又一部借他人酒杯浇我们心中块垒的电影，但是看多了韩国同类影片，感觉还不如韩影能煽到我，另法官被塑造得太脸谱化了，像一群闹事的学生在挑战班主任。
庭审过程中嬉皮士的机智比起精英学生毫不逊色 甚至像吃了可爱多
感觉小雀斑随时都会唱起来：red, the blood of angry men🌝🌝
灯塔宣传片，压根就是个广播剧，明显不过的意识形态输出
4.5，为思想和文化倾向的审判，这场审判是由谁挑起的？是我们，我们的血。确实，嬉皮士的出发点是没有错的，可其对美国社会造成的影响和危害，是不能以“我们因思想受审”这种伪命题去一笔带过的，虽然没有反转，片子里仍充斥着那股摇滚和不服输的热烈，就和那所谓“垮掉的一代”殊途同归。
最后的结案陈词说得人心沸腾，政府并不能代表国家本身，国家真正做主的应是人民本身。抛开电影回到反战这个点，美国人反战反的是他们的士兵与钱财在战争中受损而非战争的本身，这大家都知道的吧，毕竟“the whole world is watching”。
-The world is watching! - Not really. 美国人不要再我即世界了。
有民事诉讼，有刑事诉讼，这部片拍的是政治诉讼。片长两个小时出头的庭审片，艾伦索金拍得比很多片长一个半小时塞满打斗追逐枪战conspiracy 的惊悚片都精彩。我不明白大家所说的匠气是什么，我觉得这部片拍得太精致紧凑太有戏剧张力了，现实世界很难是这样的。尽管如此，仍是我今年以来看过最好的片。我喜欢这样多元的社会，希望生活在这样的社会，尽管这样的想法已经不合时宜。
片头剪辑是卡点狂魔 犀利戏谑
真的历史不在被记录下来的文字里，真的历史淹没在字与字之间的距离里。历史那么冰冷，静默，以至于那些以血为代价的摩擦，在清扫后也只留下法庭上对博的无力。致敬导演，思考必须严肃。
不太了解美国这一段历史，观影过程略枯涩了一点，但结尾小雀斑庭审的那段戏还是很燃的！对比此时此刻的灯塔国，感觉导演有意无意还是借古喻今有一些讽刺的味道，不过反战的思想无论何时还是值得肯定的。
剧本质量不错，表演只能说一般水准吧。换个牛逼导演，这片子应该会更好看。
- 与我的政府对我的蔑视相比, 我的蔑视不值一提。
当今天政治正确已经沦为了虚无主义的时候，人类还剩下什么值得相信的东西呢？
the whold world is watching！堪比当年看悲惨世界的 do you hear the people sing！但是，怀揣美国梦的爱国者们，我替你们的理想感到可惜，现实的灯塔国用过去这差不多一年的种种，彻底打脸了。左或者右，这是个永远无解的命题，但我相信，自由民主，始终会是对此有所追求的理想主义者们，心中的向往。
两个多月没有看电影，享受每一分钟。跳出电影的话，对选举的热爱有点迷信了？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
