Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
已经算是近几年东北文化主题电影里，比较有文化层次的类型了。
很好的题材，像一个带着经历的故事，也像一个爱电影人的梦
1：当年《爱笑会议室》那批人都出来了，非常好（弱弱的问句古筝那丫头怎么没有消息了呢：）。2：要论喜剧，说实话还得剑指东北。2：社会派喜剧，关注刑满释放人员，非常好的话题。
三个重新走向社会的人加上一个“范大明白”，一场300万的葬礼，一段20年前的纠葛
太差了，别拍电影了行吗，侮辱了电影这两个字。
带有国美特色的影片，前半部分感觉在对标《伊万的童年》，但是小男孩死得太快……摄影和灯光方面倒是超级棒，真的是战争片里面的一股清流，（虽然不知道这种摄影对战争类型有啥影响……）纯粹好看？人物反复死亡而重生，超现实主义？还是我单纯脸盲……水下戏还挺有趣，或许水下的姿态伸展也就是云霄的内核？好吧，没看懂，但也是一部有意思的战争片
原本以为就是一部单纯的喜剧片，崔志佳还是有点东西的。
就像主角看教父学葬礼一样，态度很好，但不会电影语言———我错了，态度好个屁
就因为梁龙一句这些最多唱一宿。看完了电影。三倍速+快进看完。
就因为梁龙一句这些最多唱一宿。看完了电影。三倍速+快进看完。
剧情内核主题很明确，演员演技恰到好处，找的演员都是东北比较有口皆碑的。
喜剧 虽然大部分是肢体笑果 但我笑了 我觉得就及格了 至于故事逻辑的小问题我觉得可以接受 还有点小思考什么的 还不错
很惊喜，节奏不错，故事也不俗套，两个遗憾，刀爷和男主爸爸的故事不完整，二手月季没唱一宿！！！！
蕴含着对特殊人群关怀内核的一部喜剧，觉得拍的也挺好的了。选角上，张琪、教母、老四这几个真的觉得是挺出彩的，也感受到了佳佳对于老朋友的照顾。觉得在这个大环境底下，能拍出来这样的电影已经挺不错的了，值得鼓励，佳佳是个好演员，还是个有追求的导演！看见他就觉得挺喜人的，也接地气。
幸福蓝海艺联 确实有点细红线的意思，但感觉形式大于内容，剧情和人物有些模糊，这就是美院的风格？
喜剧 虽然大部分是肢体笑果 但我笑了 我觉得就及格了 至于故事逻辑的小问题我觉得可以接受 还有点小思考什么的 还不错
演员们都不错，演技在线。有笑点，但逻辑不严谨，叙事感觉也有些零散。可惜没有一宿的二手玫瑰
阴间活，有点无聊，二倍速都有点看不进去。但是老四演得是真好啊哈哈
还应该推敲故事，喜剧为主比较好，对标西红柿首富吧这个不够搞笑
文刀刘老演员演技吊打众人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
