A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
喜儿真的帅
挺好看的其实，中间一度觉得很感动。想起来小时候每年都跟姐姐看喜羊羊的大电影，这部里看着里面的小羊们跟我一样也都长大了，每个小羊都有自己的光芒，真的很棒。
系列最佳，带情怀五星推荐，不带情怀7.5-8分
挺好的，每个人都给了高光部分，最后一场比赛挺燃的。没有丑化任何一个对手这点特别好
多安用一台扎古1打赢RX78和2台高机动扎古,我愿称他为0079战力天花板
第一次坐在只有三排电影院，第一次在电影院见到那么多小孩。剧情完整，插曲合适，科普和煽情并存，每只动物都有鲜明的性格，支撑它们打篮球的动力也描述得各不相同，并且也是难得在动画里看到父母的视角，总得来说是值得票价的。
寝室夜晚放映，爷青回，热血沸腾，篮球梦！83/100
从这部央视钦点的动画中可以完美读出我国社会主流意识形态所希望塑造的那种少年男女形象。令人欣慰的是喜之狼不断谋求自身的进化，并不全靠情怀。
当我时隔多年因再一次看喜羊羊而欢笑时，才发现我仍怀一颗炽热的童心；当我听到他们欢乐的笑声时，才发现喜羊羊原来从未落幕；当我听到旁边的小朋友啜泣的喊出“喜羊羊，加油！”时，才发现原来它从未停止前行。喜羊羊与灰太狼，永远值得！
相比筐出动画进一步脱离了原ip，更像是套用了几个重要角色人设另起炉灶的动物版灌篮高手，但子供向原作和新题材的排异反应依旧不小，剧情在幼稚和深度之间摇摆，就看官方如何取舍了，总的来说是一部梗足，致敬颇多且画面贼帅的篮球动画，新角色的人物弧光显得有点不足，但人家就是梆帅……
一边吐槽，一边流泪，又尬又燃。感觉像在仿《灌篮高手》。实在受不了没三句话上个价值，太刻意了，什么时候天朝的编剧可以高级点！
原画、动画、剧情、配音、动作、分镜、泪点、燃点、笑点等都很好。
喜羊羊和灰太狼上一个虎年的大电影《虎虎生威》感觉还不远，这次的虎年大电影是热血篮球。原来是筐出胜利的大电影，感觉就是在原来人物设定的基础上让它们去演了灌篮高手……粤语版听起来蛮带感的。
有瑕疵但是我还是好爱好吗
没有之前的喜羊羊的画风，更成年化了，剧情故事还可以，就是硬把篮球题材的套上喜羊羊感觉有些怪怪的。
但是作为儿童电影，算得上优秀了
陪小朋友看的 给小朋友看的剧情就不多啥了 就是励志正能量 我一分给虎翼 那个耳钉上小耳钉 脏辫 尾巴上的指环 做成玩偶应该挺可爱
第一次看喜羊羊系列大电影，全场有一半以上的孩子，看电影看出了现场篮球赛的感觉。
就算没有情怀加成，也是一部很不错的动画电影，每个人都有成长的高光，剧情虽然能看出套路，但也不算特别俗，整体故事节奏也很好。对于小学生来说或许会有些幼稚，对于大学生来说刚刚好。
有热血，有笑料，还有成年人的心酸和对梦想的执着，更有童年时看动画片时角色的原声重现呜呜呜……看得出主创对于篮球有着跟主角们一样的热情，全片充斥着篮球的方方面面和对运动的深情告白。电影并不只是突出喜羊羊或者灰太狼这样单一的主体，团队里的每一个主要角色都有笔墨。喜羊羊的闪电移动和节奏走位，沸羊羊的爆扣，美羊羊的勇敢，懒羊羊的奇袭，暖洋洋的守护，灰太狼的“剑盾”结合……更有意思的是，本片并没有严格意义上的反派，作为对手的虎翼，其与父亲之间的矛盾与释然不仅关照了现实，还让篮球电影中的对手角色更有了人性温情和情感深度，实为一大亮点。影片中，同为父亲的灰太狼和送外卖的虎翼爸爸的深夜冷暖让人印象深刻。总之，《筐出未来》是一部既欢乐有热血还兼具现实教育意义的诚意之作，值得一看。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
