Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
~机器人一诞生就是bug，过于智能了，而且情节、人物关系真不是我的菜。。。
因为Human Contradiction吗
看着瘦骨嶙峋的汤叔真的直观的感受到末日的绝望，旅程的遭遇更是让人感到孤独，绝望，芬奇担心自己不在，杰夫没办法照顾好goodyear，距离旧金山不远处看到蝴蝶的瞬间，感受阳光的瞬间，支起遮阳伞，that is it，living，就在这感受生活最后的瞬间。btw教育真的很重要，芬奇选的书，和他分享给杰夫的故事，和杰夫说的话，将他变成这个有爱的机器人，教他和狗建立信任，但是又不要信任任何人。很矛盾，可是却是生存下去的方法。芬奇设定的程序，永远不要伤害人类也不能坐视人类被伤害，芬奇既绝望却又在杰夫身上寄予着希望，显示了不失人性的一面。
原来是阿甘、大兵瑞恩、幸福终点站啊。
雖然不乏編劇硬來的強設定，但那份善意和暖意還是挺讓人動容
谁能顶得住机器人的温情啊。
一场旅行，因为有汉克斯大叔在，变的有情有意思。
浪费时间。。。。。。。一帮子豆瓣小清新sb(包括看沙丘都不会去电影院看，但又会假装自己很爱电影的某著名电影学院教授)会喜欢的片子
末日生存独角戏，狗狗很加分。但当科幻电影看其实算比较平庸那种。
旧金山宣传片，质感比隔壁网飞好的多——等人类死光，下一个王朝就是猩球崛起了。
从一开篇就沉浸到设定中，跟随Finch感受他最后的人生。它撼动我的心，我给它五星。
最后的合影破防了但忍不住思考：一个有情感的机器人和狗谁应该享有更多priority？让有情感的机器人牺牲自己保护狗是不是一种不人道主义行为？
最幸福的竟然是固特异这个汪星人，杰夫胸口留了一个电动狗罐头开罐器，太骚了🤣
故事，说它简单，关于信任及其传递；说它复杂，人类交给机器人了生命和希望，扮演完了进化历程中自己的角色，交接给新的物种。
原来是阿甘、大兵瑞恩、幸福终点站啊。
4. 科学宅只会只有机器人儿子。
虽然最后二十分钟哭了一卷卫生纸但还是要扣一星，因为人类对机器人太坏了 😡
全片最爱的片段：在阳光底下爆米花直接炸开来，jeff跺着脚喊着：more，more，more.真是足够及时行乐呀！
看到好几个电影的影子，但是看这个老头演戏就很舒服。
即使把机器人换成一个青少年 故事也很难出现大范围的改动 只能说没什么惊喜
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
